Recent Blog Posts
Slowly Changing Dimensions in Master Data Management
Slowly changing dimensions (SCDs) are the key to making master data useful across both operations and analytics. This article explains all SCD types (0–6), compares MDM vs DW treatment, and shows how to implement change tracking using SQL Server, Informatica, and ADF.
When and Why to Build a Master Data API
Most teams do not plan a master data API. They build one after friction appears. This article explains when an API makes sense, what it should do, and who it really serves.
Master Data Architecture for Microservices
As organizations move to distributed architectures, customer, product, and reference data no longer live behind shared tables or implicit ownership. Identity must be explicit. Consistency becomes a design choice. Every shortcut taken in master data architecture shows up later as duplication, drift, or fragile integrations.
Coexistence and Hybrid MDM Architecture Patterns
Centralization makes sense when a domain has clear ownership, limited contributors, strict controls, and low tolerance for inconsistency. Product data, pricing structures, or regulated reference data often meet these conditions. Centralization is also appropriate when latency must be minimal or when operational systems cannot reliably synchronize changes. Choosing centralization for a specific domain is not a failure of coexistence. It is a recognition of practical constraints.
MDM Architectural Styles Explained: Registry to Centralized
Most teams hear terms like registry, consolidation, coexistence, and centralized MDM but never get a clear explanation of how they differ. This guide breaks down each architectural style in simple terms, shows where it fits, and highlights the tradeoffs that matter for your program, your systems, and your budget.
How Naming Conventions Impact Master Data
Naming conventions aren’t cosmetic. They shape how data is interpreted and shared across systems. This article shows how poor naming creates friction, and how clear, consistent standards improve master data quality, governance, and interoperability.
Don’t Trust the Source System in Master Data
Source systems create data, but that doesn’t make them reliable everywhere. This article shows why blind trust fails and how to build a trust framework that resolves conflicts and supports enterprise outcomes.
Versioning and Lineage in Master Data Explained
Master data changes often, and you need more than the latest version to manage it well. This post breaks down how to track versions, capture lineage, and maintain a full audit trail. You learn why history matters, how to design it, and what tools support traceability across your master data systems.
Data Quality Rules That Actually Work (Part 2)
Writing data quality rules is easy. Enforcing them is where the real value comes from. Learn how to implement, monitor, and manage data quality rules that actually work.